NCTJ Court Reporting Practice Exam

In what scenario is Section 46 anonymity typically applied?

1. When being named would involve media coverage

2. When being named might limit the witness's testimony

3. When witnesses are minors

4. When evidence is deemed irrelevant

The correct answer is: When being named might limit the witness's testimony

Section 46 anonymity is typically applied in scenarios where naming a witness might limit their ability to provide testimony. This provision is designed to protect witnesses who may be intimidated or reluctant to speak openly due to fear of repercussions, harassment, or other consequences that might arise from the exposure of their identity. The rationale is that when witnesses feel secure about their anonymity, they may be more willing to contribute fully and truthfully to the legal process, which ultimately supports the pursuit of justice. In contrast, while media coverage could influence a witness’s willingness to testify and being named could impact minors, those situations are not the primary focus of Section 46. Additionally, evidence being deemed irrelevant does not directly relate to anonymity but rather pertains to the admissibility of the evidence in court.