Which case established the requirement for courts to disclose the names of magistrates involved in a case?

The case that established the requirement for courts to disclose the names of magistrates involved in a case is known as R v Felixstowe Justices. In this ruling, the court determined that the identification of magistrates is essential for ensuring accountability and transparency in the judicial process. The principle behind this ruling is rooted in the idea that justice must not only be done but must also be seen to be done, which includes knowing who is making decisions in the courts. This landmark decision serves to protect the public's right to fair trial standards and promotes trust in the judiciary by ensuring that those who serve in judicial roles are known and can be held accountable for their decisions.

Understanding this established precedent is crucial for court reporters, as it underscores the importance of transparency in the legal process and highlights the role of magistrates in maintaining public confidence in the justice system. The other cases listed may address different legal principles or procedural issues but do not focus on the requirement for disclosure of magistrate names in the same context as R v Felixstowe Justices.